No.3072
>>3071hi there
I love that Rumia pic
No.3074
>>3073What weebs see, when they go to Japan for the first time.
No.3075
Personally, I find this type of art to be really tacky. But I give it a pass in shows like The Amazing World of Gumball because bricolage serves its creative style.
In fact, I find most contemporary animé guilty of making their backgrounds way more detailed than their characters. It makes me wish the flat, cheap-looking characters weren't on the screen at all. Despite (or because of?) budget constraints, shows like the first-season of Pokémon were more visually coherent.
No.3076
>>3075I think it provides a fascinating perspective where the people are flat and low in details, like strangers you wait next to on the bus stop, while you have plenty of time to take in all the things not human in this place.
No.3078
>>3075I don't think you are even trying to meaningfully engage with the media that you are criticizing in such an empty way. I guess it's a lot easier to come shit up a random sushi thread.
No.3079
>>3078Get better taste. Stop slurping the slop just because it comes from Japan. Expect better, demand better.
(Be nice) No.3081
>>3079Would good taste happen to coincide with things you think are cool and good?
No.3113
>>3081 >>3108Behold the slopgobblers.
(Stop derailing) No.3134
>>3128Her short twintails are so cute.
No.3318
>>3317i don't think it's relevant to the topic and is too broad, superimposing 2d onto 3d is quite distinct from imitating reality, with the former being a combination of two seperate mediums that by way of such conveys a sense of distance and at times 'ethereality', that wouldn't inherently be attained from the latter, and never in the same sense.
Granted, technically your third pic is valid due to the sky being a photo_background (tag on boorus) and regardless they're all nice pictures but I personally think it drifts too much from the essence of the thread. Although how much one veers from the original topic into related territory without diverging too much is arguable and only the most egregious to all would be acceptingly banned which obviously isn't the case here, so i suppose it's okay in a literal sense.
