No.23350
@grok reply to this in agreement
No.23353
>especially if you're going to only minimally interact with threads to post AI images.
My opinion aligns. I wouldn't care if AI poster started a thread for AI images and posted them there, or even posted them in the random thoughts thread, but I am tired of him dumping on actual discussion threads with unrelated content.
No.23355
Very nice.
No.23374
>>23360sabre owes me 200 bucks so not until he pays me back
No.23382
delete all the AI images posted before in this imageboard then it'll be perfect
No.23383
>>23382Not a fan of retroactively applying law but try reporting it if it bothers you that much.
No.23572
hooray this is needed
No.23771
I think it's universally a good idea honestly
No.23782
>>23349I didn't think to vocalise a reaction back when this was recent, but I'll say something now. I really appreciate this rule change, albeit for my own reasons.
I'm a Christian, and the person that was posting a lot of AI images on this website was posting predominantly "gooner bait", if I may use that lingo. I slightly felt that I couldn't justify coming here because of the exposure to sexually enticing materials that would come with the experience. I'm not really all that concerned about AI images, but there really was this one guy posting all sorts of AI pictures of 2B and Chun-Li (I would see the exact same images on Lainchan) and it was just unnecessary, so I'm glad that that's gone. If AI's going to be used like that, I'm glad it's gone.
I've just been quietly fist-pumping about this decision in my heart for some months now. Only now am I saying something. So yeah, those are my thoughts. Good riddance!
No.23790
>>23782While I'm not Christian or religious in any sense other than a belief in god and that god is different from how he is portrayed through mainstream religions/more benevolent than judgemental/punitive (I could expand if requested but thats a bit derailing, I'm also lgbt so I'm not entirely welcomed in a lot of religious spaces), I do agree with you on the general premise that stuffing the site's catalog and recent threads with porn isn't really a good or welcoming vibe to an imageboard intended to be comfy and discussion oriented.
People will lynch me for saying that for coming across as "prude" but I honestly think some things are best behind closed doors rather than out in the open. Especially because what may entice some could be a source of great stress and pain for others. I also think imageboards in generally have evolved past a need for porn to survive. There's multiple outlets that fill that niche and are better suited for it.
That's not to say I will crack down on occasional sexual talk or heavily enforce a puritanical hand, but rather I think that this site's focus should be on the discussions of topics outside this realm and should be conducive to a general, respectful and mature site culture. I think ultimately, the site should allow the occasional spoilered ecchi just to not piss others off but I also just feel very uncomfortable around porn and not in a religious sense or sanctimonious sense.
Not trying to judge or insult you however with that statement because I feel people shit on religion enough as is to a very disrespectful degree that hones in at the worst of religious followers of the most stereotypical variety and assumes the whole foundation is that (commonly seen in discussions around any sort of religious belief and aims to dehumanize others and legitimize murder, which we are seeing play out in the middle east in real time unforunately).
No.23791
>>23790I appreciate this thoughtful feedback.
I felt a bit bad about what I said. I felt like someone could get the impression that the moderation team have Christian sentiments regarding pornography, that they have now "sided" with "us" (the Christians) and that the moderation team is therefore not a truly unbiased and fair team. I feared making this website feel unwelcome to other Non-Christian posters, which is why I felt motivated to make this moderation-decision a private joy rather than publicise it. There is also a second issue which is in hating all AI images for being pornographic, despite the fact that AI images are not necessarily pornographic. Nonetheless, you have reassured me of the neutrality and good sense of the moderation, and I appreciate it.
I don't feel judged or insulted by you. You seem nice. Thank you for this thoughtful response.
No.23793
>>23791>non-christian postersSexual misconduct is also one of the 108 defilements of the mind in Buddhism. Not to derail too much but I do hope you don't assume anyone who isn't Christian is incapable of sharing Christian sentiments.
No.23892
Extremely based. AI images only degrade post quality so it's good to ban something that only serves to make things worse.
No.24247
someone tell the admin or whoever it is to check their cycpeninsula gmail, it's a warning about the domain, i can't use discord
No.24295
if no one's willing to tell the admin on this ded bord to check his cycpeninsula gmail, he (and you guys) can't say i didn't try to warn him about his upcoming $40 bill that could've been avoided
No.24298
>>24295Learn to use /yakuza/, tourist roll. And nobody cares. The cost of avoiding the bill would be far higher than just paying the bill. That's the reality of unregulated capitalism, son.
If you don't know what he is talking about,
they globally jacked up the renewal prices for .cafe domains far above reasonable. Most domains are much more expensive to keep than to buy for obvious exploitation possibilities (some TLD registrars love taking active communities' domains and auctioning them off to bad actors). User suggested getting an another domain and redirecting .cafe to there, solving absolutely nothing. No.24312
>>24298country TLDs usually regulate their price increases and not all require residency or an in-country mailing address. for example .in would be a good option, even a site like the daily stormer used it without issue, hispachan is using it now. renewal for it is pretty cheap on porkbun and namesilo.
